![]() ![]() ![]() 1038).Īlso, few other studies have used the SAS in research (e.g., ). ![]() The authors concluded that the results of their study “provide further validity to the SAS as an appropriate measure of social aptitudes in the population” ( p. ![]() The SAS predicted psychiatric disorders and the number of friends and, to be more specific, diagnoses like ASD, ADHD, and conduct disorder. The correlation between the SAS and the Child Behavior Checklist social problems scale was in the expected direction and was found to be higher for children and adolescents with low scores (i.e., worse functioning) on the SAS ( r = -0.52, p < 0.001) and non-significant for children and adolescents with high scores on the SAS ( r = -0.05, p = 0.65). Fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated good model fit for the one-factor model of the SAS. The other study that examined the SAS was conducted by Axelrud, DeSousa in a relatively large sample of Brazilian parents of 6–14-year-old children and adolescents from a “high-risk study for psychiatric disorders”. Liddle, Batty concluded that children and adolescents “with low SAS scores are at an increased risk of mental health problems, with ASDs becoming particularly likely at very low scores” (p. The SAS was better at discriminating between children with and without ASD than the SDQ total score. The strongest correlations were found between the SAS and the SDQ total difficulties score ( r = − 0.44, p < 0.001, N = 7758) and the SDQ prosocial scale ( r = 0.42, p < 0.001, N = 7758) both from the SDQ parent version, respectively. Correlations between scores from the SAS and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ ) were in the expected directions, and correlations were low to moderate indicating that the two instruments assess different constructs. Liddle, Batty presented the distribution of the total SAS scores for three age groups and found that the modal score was 20, which represents a mean item score of 2. They report that all items of the SAS loaded on one factor and calculated a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88 for the SAS. The first study that presented and examined the SAS was conducted by Liddle, Batty in a large and representative community sample of British parents of 5–16-year-old children and adolescents. There are only two studies who report on the psychometric properties of the SAS. That is, a score of 12 or less on the SAS indicated difficulties in social functioning and necessitates that all items of the ASD diagnostic section of the DAWBA are completed. The SAS is used together with the ASD diagnosis module to diagnose ASD in the DAWBA. The items focus on interactive skills (e.g., “Able to compromise and be flexible" and “Easy to chat with, even if it isn’t on a topic that specially interests him/her”) rather than on relatively easily learned skills (e.g., saying “please” or “thank you” ). The SAS is part of the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA ). Each item is rated on a on a five-point scale from 0 (A lot worse than average), 1 (A bit worse than average), 2 (About average), 3 (A bit better than average), and 4 (A lot better than average), with lower scores indicating worse function – the reference group being other children of the same age. The Social Aptitudes Scale (SAS) is a ten-item questionnaire that measures skills in social understanding and behavior that vary from individual to individual and that are usually not fully developed in ASD. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is, for example, characterized by persistent deficits in communication and interaction, including deficits in social-emotional reciprocity, in nonverbal communication, and in developing, understanding, and maintaining relationships, in addition to restricted and repetitive behaviors, activities, or interests. Difficulties in social skills are associated with many mental disorders, including neurodevelopmental disorders. Social skills are important for the mental well-being and in order to build and maintain good relationships. It includes all verbal- and non-verbal communication, and skills like sharing, cooperating, being empathetic, and listening to what other people have to say. Social skills are skills that an individual exhibits when communicating and interacting with others. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |